{"id":132297,"date":"2026-02-08T03:03:17","date_gmt":"2026-02-07T21:33:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aviationa2z.com\/?p=132297"},"modified":"2026-02-08T03:03:21","modified_gmt":"2026-02-07T21:33:21","slug":"united-attendants-rejected-contract-now-airline-begins-new-scheduling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aviationa2z.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/08\/united-attendants-rejected-contract-now-airline-begins-new-scheduling\/","title":{"rendered":"United 71% Attendants Rejected Contract Now Airline Begins New Scheduling"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

CHICAGO-<\/strong> United Airlines (UA)<\/a> cabin crew rejected a tentative labor contract, sending both sides back to negotiations as scheduling reforms and pay structure remain disputed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The airline now links future contract improvements to operational savings, including the adoption of a new scheduling system for flight attendants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"United
Representative Photo: United Airlines<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

United Begins New Scheduling for Attendants<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Seventy-one percent of United flight attendants<\/a> rejected the tentative agreement negotiated between United Airlines and the AFA-CWA union, despite the proposal including pay increases after five years without raises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Union leaders had argued the deal stretched airline finances to their limits. However, many crew members expected additional gains, particularly compensation for airport standby time and clearer protections around hotel standards during layovers. When those expectations were not fully met, dissatisfaction grew.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The union has since surveyed members to reassess priorities, and negotiations are scheduled to resume. United has also communicated directly with employees, signaling willingness to address airport waiting time pay but insisting overall contract costs cannot increase without tradeoffs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This situation has placed scheduling reform at the center of negotiations, View from the Wing<\/a> reported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Representative Photo: United<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

How the Preferential Bidding System Changes Scheduling<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

United is promoting the adoption of the Preferential Bidding System, known as PBS, to replace the current monthly line bidding system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under today’s system, management builds fixed monthly schedules, and flight attendants bid for those lines based on seniority. After the assignment, crews trade or drop trips to adjust schedules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PBS works differently. Flight attendants submit preferences for trips, days off, layovers, or report times. A system then assigns trips based on those preferences while respecting staffing rules and seniority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PBS does not change how trips are constructed, nor does it eliminate trading or pickups. It replaces only the line creation process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Major U.S. carriers such as American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and JetBlue Airways already use PBS, and United pilots have operated under it for over two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"United
Photo: AFA-CWA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Why United Wants PBS in the Agreement<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

United argues PBS improves operational efficiency and reduces last-minute scheduling disruptions. The airline believes better staffing alignment reduces administrative work and operational costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Management also says these efficiencies free funds that can support pay and benefit improvements within the same financial limits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Operational goals include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n